Signing the paper is not the same as recording the approval.
A signed letter sitting in somebody's drawer has approved nothing. Until
the original reaches the custodian, is scanned into the document store,
and is tied to the reference on the cover sheet, the request is still
waiting and will expire on time like any other.
Three people, and no two of them may be the same person.
Some actions need a fourth: a second verifier who checks the original
after the custodian has recorded it. The approval policy decides which
ones, not the person doing the work.
We can say who was recorded as signing, who witnessed it, how they were
identified, when, where, on how many pages, and where the original is
now. We can say the scan has not changed since it was recorded.
We cannot say the signature is genuine. There is no cryptography in a wet
signature. We do not match the signature image, we do not read the page
with OCR, and we do not match faces. Anybody who tells you the system
verified the handwriting is wrong.
Each of these leaves the approval unrecorded and opens a case for
somebody to look at. None of them means the signature was bad. They mean
nobody can tell.
Ask the custodian which of the five it was. Four of them are fixed by
finding the original or rescanning it. One of them, a late capture, means
signing again over the current version.